Age is not a sole predictor of outcomes in octogenarians undergoing complex endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the perioperative, postoperative, and long-term outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) in octogenarians compared with nonoctogenarians. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Vascular Quality Improvement database, which prospectively captures information on patients who undergo vascular surgery across 1021 academic and community hospitals in North America. All patients who underwent F/BEVAR endovascular aortic repair from 2012 to 2022 were included. Patients were stratified into two groups: those aged <80 years and those aged ≥80 years at the time of the procedure. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were compared between the two groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included aortic-specific mortality and aortic-specific reintervention. RESULTS: A total of 6007 patients (aged <80 years, n = 4860; aged ≥80 years, n = 1147) who had undergone F/BEVAR procedures were included. No significant difference was found in technical success, postoperative length of stay, length of intensive care unit stay, postoperative bowel ischemia, and spinal cord ischemia. After adjustment for baseline covariates, octogenarians were more likely to suffer from a postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.16; [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.37], P < .001) and be discharged to a rehabilitation center (OR: 1.60; [95% CI: 1.27-2.00], P < .001) or nursing home (OR: 2.23; [95% CI: 1.64-3.01], P < .001). Five-year survival was lower in octogenarians (83% vs 71%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.70; [95% CI: 1.46-2.0], P < .0001). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that age was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 1.72, [95% CI: 1.39-2.12], P < .001) and aortic-specific mortality (HR: 1.92, [95% CI: 1.04-3.68], P = .038). Crawford extent II aortic disease was associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (HR 1.49; [95% CI: 1.01-2.19], P < .001), aortic-specific mortality (HR: 5.05; [95% CI: 1.35-18.9], P = .016), and aortic-specific reintervention (HR: 1.91; [95% CI: 1.24-2.93], P = .003). Functional dependence was associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR: 2.90; [95% CI: 1.87-4.51], P < .001) and aortic-specific mortality (HR: 4.93; [95% CI: 1.69-14.4], P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that octogenarians do have a mildly increased mortality rate and rate of adverse events after F/BEVAR procedures. Despite this, when adjusted for other risk factors, on par with other medical comorbidities and therefore age should be strict exclusion criterion for F/BEVAR procedures, rather age should be considered in the global context of patient's aortic anatomy, health, and functional status.

Evaluating ChatGPT on Orbital and Oculofacial Disorders: Accuracy and Readability Insights.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and readability of responses generated by the artificial intelligence model, ChatGPT (version 4.0), to questions related to 10 essential domains of orbital and oculofacial disease. METHODS: A set of 100 questions related to the diagnosis, treatment, and interpretation of orbital and oculofacial diseases was posed to ChatGPT 4.0. Responses were evaluated by a panel of 7 experts based on appropriateness and accuracy, with performance scores measured on a 7-item Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability was determined via the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The artificial intelligence model demonstrated accurate and consistent performance across all 10 domains of orbital and oculofacial disease, with an average appropriateness score of 5.3/6.0 ("mostly appropriate" to "completely appropriate"). Domains of cavernous sinus fistula, retrobulbar hemorrhage, and blepharospasm had the highest domain scores (average scores of 5.5 to 5.6), while the proptosis domain had the lowest (average score of 5.0/6.0). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52 to 0.74), reflecting moderate inter-rater reliability. The responses exhibited a high reading-level complexity, representing the comprehension levels of a college or graduate education. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential of ChatGPT 4.0 to provide accurate information in the field of ophthalmology, specifically orbital and oculofacial disease. However, challenges remain in ensuring accurate and comprehensive responses across all disease domains. Future improvements should focus on refining the model's correctness and eventually expanding the scope to visual data interpretation. Our results highlight the vast potential for artificial intelligence in educational and clinical ophthalmology contexts.

Outcomes of Elective and Non-elective Fenestrated-branched Endovascular Aortic Repair for Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes after elective and non-elective fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). BACKGROUND: FB-EVAR has been increasingly utilized to treat TAAAs; however, outcomes after non-elective versus elective repair are not well described. METHODS: Clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing FB-EVAR for TAAAs at 24 centers (2006-2021) were reviewed. Endpoints including early mortality and major adverse events (MAEs), all-cause mortality, and aortic-related mortality (ARM), were analyzed and compared in patients who had non-elective versus elective repair. RESULTS: A total of 2603 patients (69% males; mean age 72±10 year old) underwent FB-EVAR for TAAAs. Elective repair was performed in 2187 patients (84%) and non-elective repair in 416 patients [16%; 268 (64%) symptomatic, 148 (36%) ruptured]. Non-elective FB-EVAR was associated with higher early mortality (17% vs 5%, P <0.001) and rates of MAEs (34% vs 20%, P <0.001). Median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 7-37 months). Survival and cumulative incidence of ARM at 3 years were both lower for non-elective versus elective patients (50±4% vs 70±1% and 21±3% vs 7±1%, P <0.001). On multivariable analysis, non-elective repair was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI] 1.50-2.44; P <0.001) and ARM (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.63-3.62; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Non-elective FB-EVAR of symptomatic or ruptured TAAAs is feasible, but carries higher incidence of early MAEs and increased all-cause mortality and ARM than elective repair. Long-term follow-up is warranted to justify the treatment.

Iatrogenic distal aortic rupture in a patient with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome is a rare inherited connective tissue disorder that can result in significant morbidity and mortality. This report details an iatrogenic aortic rupture during an endovascular approach in the management of critical limb ischemia in a 27-year-old woman who presented with acute onset of severe sensory deficit of the left leg. Conversion to open repair with a midline laparotomy and an aortic-left popliteal bypass was performed. In the endovascular era, we highlight that even minimally invasive therapeutic interventions can have devastating adverse events in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

Comparison of single- and multistage strategies during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of single or multistage approach during fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for extent I to III TAAAs in 24 centers (2006-2021). All patients received a single brand manufactured patient-specific or off-the-shelf fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Staging strategies included proximal thoracic aortic repair, minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization, temporary aneurysm sac perfusion and combinations of these techniques. Endpoints were analyzed for elective repair in patients who had a single- or multistage approach before and after propensity score adjustment for baseline differences, including the composite 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia, major adverse event, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1947 patients (65% male; mean age, 71 ± 8 years) underwent FB-EVAR of 155 extent I (10%), 729 extent II (46%), and 713 extent III TAAAs (44%). A single-stage approach was used in 939 patients (48%) and a multistage approach in 1008 patients (52%). A multistage approach was more frequently used in patients undergoing elective compared with non-elective repair (55% vs 35%; P < .001). Staging strategies were proximal thoracic aortic repair in 743 patients (74%), temporary aneurysm sac perfusion in 128 (13%), minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization in 10 (1%), and combinations in 127 (12%). Among patients undergoing elective repair (n = 1597), the composite endpoint of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia rate occurred in 14% of single-stage and 6% of multistage approach patients (P < .001). After adjustment with a propensity score, multistage approach was associated with lower rates of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and/or permanent paraplegia (odds ratio, 0.466; 95% confidence interval, 0.271-0.801; P = .006) and higher patient survival at 1 year (86.9±1.3% vs 79.6±1.7%) and 3 years (72.7±2.1% vs 64.2±2.3%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.714; 95% confidence interval, 0.528-0.966; P = .029), compared with a single stage approach. CONCLUSIONS: Staging elective FB-EVAR of extent I to III TAAAs was associated with decreased risk of mortality and/or permanent paraplegia at 30 days or within hospital stay, and with higher patient survival at 1 and 3 years.

Primary Thoracic Endografting for T4 Lung Cancer Aortic Involvement.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to present the results in patients with a T4 thoracic tumor with aortic involvement who were treated with a thoracic endograft before surgical resection. DESCRIPTION: All consecutive patients undergoing a thoracic endograft procedure before an oncologic resection between January 2012 and December 2019 were reviewed in a single-center retrospective study. Included patients had either a T4 lung tumor or a mediastinal tumor invading the thoracic aorta. EVALUATION: Nine patients were included: 7 with T4 lung cancer, 1 with sarcoma, and 1 patient with thymoma. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 22-47 months). There were no endograft-related complications. All but 1 patient had an R0 oncologic resection. Eight patients were alive and free from recurrence at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Use of thoracic stent grafting before surgical resection for patients with a thoracic tumor invading the aorta is a feasible option that obviates the need for extracorporeal circulation and its associated morbidity. This technique could be an alternative strategy in the treatment of tumors invading the thoracic aorta.

Open descending thoracic aorta aneurysm repair with removal of multiple previous endovascular devices.

False lumen patency is a poor prognostic factor for favorable aortic remodeling in patients with chronic aortic dissection. Several endovascular techniques are available to obliterate the false lumen; however, they are not always successful. We present the case of a 55-year old male with a chronic type B dissection and a large descending thoracic aortic aneurysm with rapid growth, up to 90 mm, despite attempted control of the false lumen with several endovascular devices (thoracic aortic stent graft, Amplatzer device, glue and candy plug). Successful aneurysmal open repair was achieved by removing these devices during the procedure. This case demonstrates the technical challenges of explanting an aortic stent graft and multiple other devices during distal aortic repair.

Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Iliac Artery Tortuosity and Calcification.

INTRODUCTION: During endovascular aneurysm repair, the iliac artery typically serves as a conduit for device delivery. The degree of tortuosity and calcification in the iliac artery ultimately determines whether the device can successfully traverse the vessel. These 2 parameters can be assessed using qualitative approaches or calculated using quantitative methods based on the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards. The objective of this study was to determine whether qualitative methods are sufficient to accurately assess iliac artery tortuosity and calcification by calculating interobserver variability and comparing them to the SVS Reporting Standards. METHODS: Three vascular surgeons reviewed preoperative computed tomography scans for 50 patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and qualitatively assessed left and right iliac artery tortuosity and calcification. Iliac artery geometries were segmented from these image sets. Tortuosity index and calcification length ratio were calculated and categorized based on the SVS Reporting Standards. RESULTS: Interobserver variability was calculated for the qualitative assessments using interclass correlation coefficients. For tortuosity index, among the 3 observers, good agreement was found for the left iliac artery and fair agreement was found for the right. For calcification length ratio, excellent agreement was found for both iliac arteries. When compared to the quantitative assessment, the qualitative assessments underpredicted tortuosity in 2.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 16.7% of cases, and overpredicted tortuosity in 81.0% of cases. The qualitative assessments underpredicted calcification in 46.3% of cases, matched the quantitative values in 49.3% of cases, and overpredicted calcification in 4.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Qualitative assessment of iliac artery tortuosity showed fair-to-good interobserver agreement and poor agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. Qualitative assessment of iliac artery calcification showed excellent interobserver agreement and fair agreement to SVS Reporting Standards. These trends should be considered when qualitative reporting methodologies are used.

Impact of fenestrated stent graft misalignment on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: During fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR), accurate alignment of the fenestration and the target artery is necessary to prevent complications. This study's objective is to determine the incidence of clinical outcomes following fenestration misalignment during FEVAR. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review was performed for all elective FEVARs between January 2008 and April 2015. Data were gathered from patient records and intraoperative imaging. Native vessel angles were calculated using the vessel centerlines. Intraoperative stent graft orientation was determined by changing the angle of the image intensifier as the fenestration was profiled for cannulation. Vertical fenestration misalignment was defined as 4 mm or greater and is the distance from the center of the fenestration markers to the center of the target vessel ostium at the time of cannulation. Horizontal stent graft misalignment was defined as a difference between the native vessel angle and the intraoperative fenestration angle of 15° or more. Early and late clinical outcomes were analyzed with respect to the presence of either vertical or horizontal misalignment of the renal artery fenestrations. RESULTS: The study cohort includes 65 patients who underwent FEVAR during this study period. A horizontal misalignment of 15° or more occurred in 40% of patients (n = 26) and 30° or more in 9.2% of patients (n = 6). A vertical misalignment of 4 mm or greater occurred in 32.3% of patients (n = 21). The incidence of severe postoperative complications, defined as any in-hospital end-organ ischemia and/or death, was significantly greater for patients with stent graft misalignment-31% (n = 11) vs 3% (n = 1) in the aligned group. There was a trend toward higher rates of target vessel cannulation failure in patients with stent graft misalignment 3% (n = 99 fenestrations) vs 0% (n = 76 fenestrations). The combined incidence of any intraoperative target vessel complication was significantly higher in patients with misalignment, 8.1% (4, 15) vs 1.3% (0, 8). Long-term survival was significantly lower in patients with stent graft misalignment, which was primarily driven by high intraoperative and in-hospital mortality rates (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative stent graft misalignment is associated with higher rates of procedural target vessel complications and severe postoperative adverse events. Patients with stent graft misalignment should be considered at high risk for early postoperative complications. These results highlight an important need for improved FEVAR planning.

Multicenter Analysis of Endovascular Aortic Arch In Situ Stent-Graft Fenestrations for Aortic Arch Pathologies.

BACKGROUND: In situ fenestration of aortic stent grafts for treatment of aortic arch aneurysms is a new option for endovascular aortic arch repair. So far, only few reports have shown perioperative and short-term results of in situ fenestrations for aortic arch diseases. We present the multicenter experience with the aortic arch in situ fenestration technique documented in the AARCHIF registry for treatment of aortic arch aneurysms or localized type A aortic dissections and analyzed perioperative outcome and midterm follow-up. METHODS: Patients with aortic arch pathologies treated by aortic arch in situ fenestration with proximal stent graft landing in aortic arch Ishimura zones 0 and 1 were included in the registry. Stent-graft in situ fenestrations were created using needles or radiofrequency or laser catheters and completed by implantation of covered connecting stent grafts. Single in situ fenestrations for the left subclavian artery (LSA) were excluded. RESULTS: Between 06/2009 and 03/2017, twenty-five patients were treated by in situ stent-graft fenestrations for aortic arch pathologies at 9 institutions in 7 different countries, 3 of them as bailout procedures for stent-graft malplacement. In situ fenestrations were performed for the brachiocephalic trunk (n = 20), the left common carotid artery (n = 21) and the LSA (n = 9). Technical success for intended in situ fenestrations was 94.0% (47/50), with additional supraaortic bypass procedures performed in 14 patients. Perioperative mortality occurred in 1 (4.0%) patient, treated as a bailout procedure and 3 (12.0%) perioperative strokes were observed. One proximal aortic stent-graft nonalignment and 4 type III endoleaks, 2 early and 2 late, required reeintervention. During follow-up (1-118 months), the diameter of aortic arch aneurysms decreased from 61.5 ± 4.1 mm to 48.4 ± 3.2 mm (P = 0.02) and, so far, 6 patients died from diseases unrelated to their aortic arch pathologies with a mean survival time of 79.5 months and 3 endovascular reinterventions for distal aortic expansion were performed. Cerebrovascular event (n = 4) was the most relevant prognostic factor for mortality during midterm follow-up (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The aortic arch in situ fenestration technique for endovascular aortic arch repair seems to be valuable treatment option for selected patients, although initial consideration of other treatment options is mandatory. Data about long-term durability are required.

Analysis of Iliac Artery Geometric Properties in Fenestrated Aortic Stent Graft Rotation.

INTRODUCTION: A complication of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair is the potential for stent graft rotation during deployment causing fenestration misalignment and branch artery occlusion. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that this rotation is caused by a buildup of rotational energy as the device is delivered through the iliac arteries and to quantify iliac artery geometric properties associated with device rotation. METHODS: A retrospective clinical study was undertaken in which iliac artery geometric properties were assessed from preoperative imaging for 42 cases divided into 2 groups: 27 in the nonrotation group and 15 in the rotation group. Preoperative computed tomography scans were segmented, and the iliac artery centerlines were determined. Iliac artery tortuosity, curvature, torsion, and diameter were calculated from the centerline and the segmented vessel geometry. RESULTS: The total iliac artery net torsion was found to be higher in the rotation group compared to the nonrotation group (23.5 ± 14.7 vs 14.6 ± 12.8 mm-1; P = .05). No statistically significant differences were found for the mean values of tortuosity, curvature, torsion, or diameter between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Stent graft rotation occurred in 36% of the cases considered in this study. Cases with high iliac artery total net torsion were found to be more likely to have stent graft rotation upon deployment. This retrospective study provides a framework for prospectively studying the influence of iliac artery geometric properties on fenestrated stent graft rotation.

Prediction of advanced endovascular stent graft rotation and its associated morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: Advanced endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with fenestrated and branched stent grafts is increasingly being used to repair complex aortic aneurysms; however, these devices can rotate unpredictably during deployment, leading to device misalignment. The objectives of this study were to quantify the short-term clinical outcomes in patients with intraoperative stent graft rotation and to identify quantitative anatomic markers of the arterial geometry that can predict stent graft rotation preoperatively. METHODS: A prospective study evaluating all patients undergoing advanced EVAR was conducted at two university-affiliated hospitals between November 2015 and December 2016. Stent graft rotation (defined as ≥10 degrees) was measured on intraoperative fluoroscopic video of the deployment sequence. Standard preoperative computed tomography angiography imaging was used to calculate the geometric properties of the arterial anatomy. Any in-hospital and 30-day complications were prospectively documented, and a composite outcome of any end-organ ischemia or death was used as the primary end point. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients undergoing advanced EVAR were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 75 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-80 years) and a mean aneurysm diameter of 64 mm (IQR, 59-65 mm). The incidence of stent graft rotation was 37% (n = 14), with a mean rotation of 25 degrees (IQR, 21-28 degrees). A nominal logistic regression model identified iliac artery torsion, volume of iliac artery calcification, and stent graft length as the primary predictive factors. The total net torsion and the total volume of calcific plaque were higher in patients with stent graft rotation, 8.9 ± 0.8 mm-1 vs 4.1 ± 0.5 mm-1 (P < .0001) and 1054 ± 144 mm3 vs 525 ± 83 mm3 (P < .01), respectively. The length of the implanted stent grafts was also higher in patients with intraoperative rotation, 172 ± 9 mm vs 156 ± 8 mm (P < .01). The composite outcome of any end-organ ischemia or death was also substantially higher in patients with stent graft rotation (36% vs 0%; P = .004). In addition, patients with stent graft rotation had significantly higher combined rates of type Ib and type III endoleaks (43% vs 8%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with intraoperative stent graft rotation have a significantly higher rate of severe postoperative complications, and this is strongly associated with higher levels of iliac artery torsion, calcification, and stent graft length. These findings suggest that preoperative quantitative analysis of iliac artery torsion and calcification may improve risk stratification of patients before advanced EVAR.

A systematic study of the effect of low pH acid treatment on anti-drug antibodies specific for a domain antibody therapeutic: Impact on drug tolerance, assay sensitivity and post-validation method assessment of ADA in clinical serum samples.

We developed a homogeneous bridging anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay on an electro chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) platform to support the immunogenicity evaluation of a dimeric domain antibody (dAb) therapeutic in clinical studies. During method development we evaluated the impact of different types of acid at various pH levels on polyclonal and monoclonal ADA controls of differing affinities and on/off rates. The data shows for the first time that acids of different pH can have a differential effect on ADA of various affinities and this in turn impacts assay sensitivity and drug tolerance as defined by these surrogate controls. Acid treatment led to a reduction in signal of intermediate and low affinity ADA, but not high affinity or polyclonal ADA. We also found that acid pretreatment is a requisite for dissociation of drug bound high affinity ADA, but not for low affinity ADA-drug complexes. Although we were unable to identify an acid that would allow a 100% retrieval of ADA signal post-treatment, use of glycine pH3.0 enabled the detection of low, intermediate and high affinity antibodies (Abs) to various extents. Following optimization, the ADA assay method was validated for clinical sample analysis. Consistencies within various parameters of the clinical data such as dose dependent increases in ADA rates and titers were observed, indicating a reliable ADA method. Pre- and post-treatment ADA negative or positive clinical samples without detectable drug were reanalyzed in the absence of acid treatment or presence of added exogenous drug respectively to further assess the effectiveness of the final acid treatment procedure. The overall ADA results indicate that assay conditions developed and validated based on surrogate controls sufficed to provide a reliable clinical data set. The effect of low pH acid treatment on possible pre-existing ADA or soluble multimeric target in normal human serum was also evaluated, and preliminary data indicate that acid type and pH also affect drug-specific signal differentially in individual samples. The results presented here represent the most extensive analyses to date on acid treatment of a wide range of ADA affinities to explore sensitivity and drug tolerance issues. They have led to a refinement of our current best practices for ADA method development and provide a depth of data to interrogate low pH mediated immune complex dissociation.

Publication outcomes for research presented at a Canadian surgical conference.

BACKGROUND: The failure of investigators to publish research in peer-reviewed journals following acceptance at a national or international meeting can lead to significant publication biases in the literature. Our objective was to evaluate the abstract to manuscript conversion rate for abstracts presented at the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery (CSVS) annual meeting and to evaluate the conversion rate for CSVS-awarded research grants. METHODS: We searched for authors of abstracts accepted at the CSVS Annual Meeting (2007-2013) and recipients of CSVS research awards (2005-2013) on Scopus and PubMed databases to identify related publications. RESULTS: We identified 84 publications from 188 research abstracts (45%) and 17 publications from 39 research grants (44%). The mean time to publication was 1.8 years and the mean impact factor was 2.7. Studies related to endovascular therapies demonstrated a trend toward a higher rate of publication relative to open surgical therapies (64 [56%] v. 37 [27%]). Additionally, we observed a similar trend in research grant topics related to endovascular therapies relative to open surgical therapies (9 [67%] v. 8 [38%]). Finally, CSVS research grant recipients who subsequently published had a significantly higher h-index at the time of receipt than those who had not published. CONCLUSION: The CSVS annual meeting's abstract to publication conversion rate is comparable to that of its Canadian peers as well as to other medical specialties; however, a substantial publication gap remains. We identified several potential areas that may help to improve the effectiveness of CSVS research grants.

CONTEXTE: Le fait que des chercheurs ne publient pas leurs recherches dans des revues évaluées par les pairs après acceptation de leur résumé à un congrès national ou international peut entraîner des biais de publication importants dans la littérature scientifique. Notre but était d'évaluer le taux de conversion de résumé à manuscrit pour les résumés présentés au congrès annuel de la Société canadienne de chirurgie vasculaire (SCCV) ainsi que le taux de conversion dans le cas des subventions de recherche accordées par la SCCV. MÉTHODES: Nous avons interrogé les bases de données de Scopus et PubMed afin d'identifier les auteurs de résumés acceptés au congrès annuel de la SCCV (2007-2013) ainsi que les récipiendaires de subventions de recherche de la SCCV (2005-2013) et les publications connexes. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons relevé 84 publications à partir de 188 résumés de recherche (45 %) ainsi que 17 publications liées à 39 subventions de recherche (44 %). Le délai moyen de publication était de 1,8 année et le facteur d'impact moyen, de 2,7. Les études sur les thérapies endovasculaires avaient un taux de publication plus élevé comparativement à celles sur les traitements chirurgicaux ouverts (64 [56 %] c. 37 [27 %]). De plus, nous avons observé une tendance similaire lorsque le sujet des recherche subventionnées était lié aux thérapies endovasculaires comparativement aux traitements chirurgicaux ouverts (9 [67 %] c. 8 [38 %]). Enfin, les récipiendaires de subventions de recherche de la SCCV qui publiaient par la suite avaient un indice h beaucoup plus élevé au moment de recevoir la subvention que les chercheurs qui n'avaient pas publié. CONCLUSION: Le taux de conversion de résumé à publication du congrès annuel de la SCCV est comparable à celui de ses pairs au Canada et à celui d'autres spécialités médicales. Il reste néanmoins une lacune importante au niveau de la publication. Nous avons cerné plusieurs aspects susceptibles d'améliorer l'efficacité des subventions de recherche de la SCCV.

Clinical outcomes and material properties of in situ fenestration of endovascular stent grafts.

OBJECTIVE: In situ fenestration of endovascular stent grafts has been used as a method for branch vessel revascularization in urgent and emergent settings. The objective of this manuscript was to review the clinical and experimental evidence related to this technique. METHODS: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases were searched for papers published until December 2015 describing in situ fenestration of aortic stent grafts. Benchtop, animal, and human studies were included. RESULTS: The literature review identified 118 articles, of which 28 studies were selected for inclusion. These included 16 clinical papers (2 case series and 14 case reports) reporting in situ fenestration of 46 aortic branch vessels in 44 patients. There were 42 retrograde and 4 antegrade instances of in situ fenestration. The most frequent target vessel for in situ fenestration was the left subclavian artery (72%), and the most frequent indication for stent graft implantation was a degenerative aortic aneurysm (43%). Technical success was reported in 44 of 46 attempted fenestrations (96%). The combined rate of perioperative mortality, stroke, and paralysis was 7%. In situ fenestration was predominantly performed with the Talent (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, Calif) stent graft (54%), followed by the Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) stent graft (37%) and the TAG (W. L. Gore & Associates, Newark, Del) stent graft (9%). In vitro benchtop evaluations of in situ fenestration showed minimal change in fenestration size after 1 year of pulsatile fatigue testing. The use of energy-based fenestration techniques (radiofrequency or laser) has been associated with less fabric fraying than in needle-based techniques. The larger caliber initial fenestration created by these devices also avoids the need for cutting balloons, which have also been linked with increased fabric tears and fraying of the fibers surrounding the fenestration. In addition, the Zenith stent graft was shown in benchtop testing to be the strongest in postfenestration mechanical testing, but it was also the most resistant to balloon dilation. CONCLUSIONS: In the short to moderate term, in situ fenestration appears to be a reasonable and effective method to extend the proximal landing zone for revascularization of the left subclavian artery. However, longer follow-up is needed to fully assess the long-term durability of this procedure. Based on studies of material properties, an energy-based fenestration technique (radiofrequency or laser) is recommended, along with the avoidance of cutting balloons for dilation of the fenestration.

Easier Said Than Done: Keys to Successful Implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (DART) Program.

PURPOSE: Systematic screening for distress in oncology clinics has gained increasing acceptance as a means to improve cancer care, but its implementation poses enormous challenges. We describe the development and implementation of the Distress Assessment and Response Tool (DART) program in a large urban comprehensive cancer center. METHOD: DART is an electronic screening tool used to detect physical and emotional distress and practical concerns and is linked to triaged interprofessional collaborative care pathways. The implementation of DART depended on clinician education, technological innovation, transparent communication, and an evaluation framework based on principles of change management and quality improvement. RESULTS: There have been 364,378 DART surveys completed since 2010, with a sustained screening rate of > 70% for the past 3 years. High staff satisfaction, increased perception of teamwork, greater clinical attention to the psychosocial needs of patients, patient-clinician communication, and patient satisfaction with care were demonstrated without a resultant increase in referrals to specialized psychosocial services. DART is now a standard of care for all patients attending the cancer center and a quality performance indicator for the organization. CONCLUSION: Key factors in the success of DART implementation were the adoption of a programmatic approach, strong institutional commitment, and a primary focus on clinic-based response. We have demonstrated that large-scale routine screening for distress in a cancer center is achievable and has the potential to enhance the cancer care experience for both patients and staff.

Understanding disposition after referral for bariatric surgery: when and why patients referred do not undergo surgery.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is an effective long-term solution for weight loss in the severely obese. Prevalence of bariatric surgery has increased over the recent years; however, the attrition rate of those referred who actually undergo surgery is high. The purpose of this study was to examine patients' attrition rates after referral for bariatric surgery at an academic tertiary care institution. When and why patients who were referred for bariatric surgery did not ultimately undergo surgical treatment was examined. METHODS: Charts of 1,237 patients referred to the Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Program from program inception to February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, appointment dates, no shows and cancellations, and when and why patients did not undergo surgery were summarized. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 47. Most patients were female, and the mean body mass index was 47. Half (50.6 %) of the total persons referred left the program prior to being seen by a health-care professional, and only 36.2 % underwent surgical treatment. Only 2.75 % of persons were ineligible for surgery. A total of 60.6 % of persons self-removed from our program. Reasons for self-removal varied, with the most common reason for leaving the program recorded as "unknown." CONCLUSIONS: Our multidisciplinary program with in-hospital psychosocial resources resulted in very few persons being excluded from receiving surgical treatment. However, less than half of those referred underwent surgery as most persons self-removed from our program for unknown reasons. Further investigation is required to determine which patient, administrative, and system factors play a role in the patients' decision to not undergo bariatric surgical treatment.

Randomized pilot trial of a synbiotic dietary supplement in chronic HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND: Infection with HIV-1 results in marked immunologic insults and structural damage to the intestinal mucosa, including compromised barrier function. While the development of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been a major advancement in the treatment of HIV-1 infection, the need for novel complementary interventions to help restore intestinal structural and functional integrity remains unmet. Known properties of pre-, pro-, and synbiotics suggest that they may be useful tools in achieving this goal. METHODS: This was a 4-week parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized pilot trial in HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy. A synbiotic formulation (Synbiotic 2000®) containing 4 strains of probiotic bacteria (10(10) each) plus 4 nondigestible, fermentable dietary fibers (2.5 g each) was provided each day, versus a fiber-only placebo formulation. The primary outcome was bacterial translocation. Secondary outcomes included the levels of supplemented bacteria in stool, the activation phenotype of peripheral T-cells and monocytes, and plasma levels of C-reactive protein and soluble CD14. RESULTS: Microbial translocation, as measured by plasma bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA concentration, was not altered by synbiotic treatment. In contrast, the synbiotic formulation resulted in significantly elevated levels of supplemented probiotic bacterial strains in stool, including L. plantarum and P. pentosaceus, with the colonization of these two species being positively correlated with each other. T-cell activation phenotype of peripheral blood lymphocytes showed modest changes in response to synbiotic exposure, with HLA-DR expression slightly elevated on a minor population of CD4+ T-cells which lack expression of HLA-DR or PD-1. In addition, CD38 expression on CD8+ T-cells was slightly lower in the fiber-only group. Plasma levels of soluble CD14 and C-reactive protein were unaffected by synbiotic treatment in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Synbiotic treatment for 4 weeks can successfully augment the levels of probiotic species in the gut during chronic HIV-1 infection. Associated changes in microbial translocation appear to be absent, and markers of systemic immune activation appear largely unchanged. These findings may help inform future studies aimed at testing pre- and probiotic approaches to improve gut function and mucosal immunity in chronic HIV-1 infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT00688311.